30 former Ohio State football players join Strauss abuse lawsuit

Thirty former Ohio State football players, including NFL veterans Al Washington, Ray Ellis, and Keith Ferguson, have joined a lawsuit against the university alleging sexual abuse by former team doctor Richard Strauss. The plaintiffs, including former team captains, aim to increase accountability after an independent investigation found Strauss abused hundreds of male students between 1978 and 1998, with university awareness dating back to 1979.
Thirty former Ohio State football players have joined a lawsuit against the university, accusing former team doctor Richard Strauss of sexual abuse. The plaintiffs include NFL veterans Al Washington, Ray Ellis, and Keith Ferguson, all former Buckeyes team captains and members of the 1980 Rose Bowl team coached by Woody Hayes. Washington, Ellis, and Ferguson played professionally after their OSU careers, with Ellis logging seven NFL seasons and Ferguson ten. Washington’s 345 career tackles at Ohio State rank eighth all-time, and his son, Al Washington Jr., currently coaches the Miami Dolphins’ linebackers. The group’s decision to come forward reflects their shared commitment to protecting future athletes and addressing the abuse they endured. The lawsuit follows an independent investigation revealing Strauss abused at least hundreds of male students between 1978 and 1998, with university officials aware of misconduct as early as 1979. Ohio State has already settled with 317 survivors for over $61 million as of April 15, though attorney Rocky Ratliff argues more victims remain unaccounted for. Washington initially stayed silent due to shame and fear of retaliation but now emphasizes accountability, citing Hayes’ teachings on integrity. The university has acknowledged its efforts to reconcile with survivors through settlements, counseling, and medical support, but critics argue its focus on settlements overshadows ongoing suffering. The new plaintiffs join ongoing legal efforts, with federal Judge Michael Watson’s recent ruling reinforcing the case’s validity. Their involvement may amplify public scrutiny and pressure for further action against the university.
This content was automatically generated and/or translated by AI. It may contain inaccuracies. Please refer to the original sources for verification.