Another AS Level Paper Allegedly Leaked in Pakistan
Students in Pakistan have accused Cambridge International Education of leaking an AS-Level Mathematics paper held on Tuesday, with the exam allegedly matching a solved version shared online the prior day. Cambridge stated they investigate all claims but declined to comment on the specific case, while urging against misinformation, following similar past leaks that led to rescheduled exams and free retakes for affected students.
Allegations of another leaked Cambridge examination paper have surfaced in Pakistan after students claimed the AS-Level Mathematics paper, administered on Tuesday, matched a solved version circulating on social media the day before. Cambridge International Education, part of Cambridge University Press & Assessment, confirmed it investigates all paper leak claims but does not provide details on individual cases. A spokesperson emphasized the organization’s commitment to addressing such concerns seriously and stated that schools are notified if issues are verified, while urging the public to rely only on official statements. This follows a previous incident involving the AS-Level Mathematics paper (9709/12) on April 29, where Cambridge acknowledged the leak’s validity and rescheduled the exam for June 9. Fresh concerns have also arisen over an alleged leak of an A-Level Business paper earlier this week. In 2025, Cambridge confirmed leaks in three AS and A-Level papers in Pakistan—Mathematics Paper 12, Mathematics Paper 42, and Computer Science Paper 22—leading to free November resits for impacted students. Cambridge exams are held twice yearly, in June and November, with results released in August and January. The organization’s response to the latest claims remains under investigation, though it has consistently taken action in past cases to ensure fairness for students. The repeated allegations highlight ongoing challenges in maintaining exam integrity in Pakistan.
This content was automatically generated and/or translated by AI. It may contain inaccuracies. Please refer to the original sources for verification.