Anthropic hit with lawsuit over Claude subscriptions as users allege AI limits are far lower than promised
Anthropic faces a class-action lawsuit in California alleging its Max 5x and Max 20x Claude subscription plans deliver significantly less usage than advertised, with claims of misleading marketing and opaque rate limits. The complaint, filed by Karl Khan, seeks damages exceeding $5 million for subscribers since April 2025, accusing the company of a 'bait and switch' tactic while it prepares for a stock market debut.
A proposed class-action lawsuit filed in a California federal court accuses Anthropic of misleading customers about the actual usage limits of its premium Claude subscription plans. The complaint, led by Karl Khan, alleges that the Max 20x plan—marketed as offering 20 times the usage of the Pro tier—delivers only six to eight times the capacity, while the Max 5x plan provides just 3.5 times the usage instead of the advertised fivefold increase. Khan, a software developer, claims his coding sessions consumed nearly one-fifth of his weekly allowance under the Max 20x plan, prompting further investigation. The lawsuit highlights a lack of transparency in Anthropic’s usage calculations, describing the company’s website as a 'black box' without clear definitions of prompts or session limits. Subscribers who hit their caps are reportedly encouraged to purchase additional credits, while Anthropic reserves the right to impose discretionary restrictions. The complaint cites widespread frustration on platforms like Reddit, where users describe the premium offerings as 'extremely misleading.' Anthropic markets usage limits as a 'conversation budget,' but the lawsuit argues the system fails to deliver on promised scalability for developers and researchers reliant on AI tools. The case seeks class-action status for all Max 5x and Max 20x subscribers since April 2025, with damages exceeding $5 million. The company, which is preparing for a stock market debut, has not responded to requests for comment. The legal challenge comes as Anthropic competes with rivals like OpenAI to expand its AI capabilities, raising questions about industry-wide practices in subscription transparency. Similar grievances have surfaced among users frustrated by unexpected usage constraints, despite the high cost of premium plans. The lawsuit underscores growing scrutiny over how AI companies communicate the limitations of their services to paying customers.
This content was automatically generated and/or translated by AI. It may contain inaccuracies. Please refer to the original sources for verification.