Politics

Hear why SC governor candidates say they're running in 2026 election

North America / United States0 views1 min
Hear why SC governor candidates say they're running in 2026 election

Nine candidates—six Republicans and three Democrats—are running for South Carolina’s governorship in the 2026 election, with key figures including Attorney General Alan Wilson, State Senator Josh Kimbrell, and U.S. Rep. Nancy Mace outlining platforms focused on tax elimination, education reform, and immigration policies. The primary elections are set for one month ahead, with candidates campaigning across the state to secure voter support.

South Carolina will elect a new governor in January 2027 for the first time in a decade, with nine candidates—six Republicans and three Democrats—competing in the 2026 election. The primary races are approaching, and candidates are actively campaigning to connect with voters across the state. Republican candidates include Attorney General Alan Wilson, who joined the race in June 2025 and prioritizes cutting government waste, expanding school choice, and improving education. State Senator Josh Kimbrell, also running since June 2025, emphasizes eliminating the state income tax, promoting legal immigration, and establishing an office of parental rights. Lieutenant Governor Pamela Evette, who entered the race in July 2025, focuses on eliminating the income tax, combating illegal immigration, and leveraging artificial intelligence to streamline government operations. U.S. Rep. Ralph Norman, running since July 2025, highlights reducing government size and investing in road infrastructure as key priorities. Democrats have three candidates, including former U.S. Rep. Jamie Harrison, who entered the race in August 2025 and emphasizes healthcare access and education funding. The candidates are scheduled to participate in interviews with *The Greenville News* to discuss their platforms and visions for the state’s future.

This content was automatically generated and/or translated by AI. It may contain inaccuracies. Please refer to the original sources for verification.

Comments (0)

Log in to comment.

Loading...