Lawmakers fight to stop the Trump administration’s dismantling of a $386M ocean observatory project
Democratic senators and House committees urged the National Science Foundation to reverse its plan to dismantle the $386 million Ocean Observatories Initiative, a network of 900 ocean sensors tracking climate change and extreme weather, calling the move illegal and scientifically unjustified. The NSF justified the cuts as part of a strategy to prioritize evolving research goals, but lawmakers argued the decision violates congressional authority and threatens coastal safety and marine research.
A bipartisan group of senators and Democratic House committees demanded the National Science Foundation (NSF) halt its plan to dismantle the Ocean Observatories Initiative (OOI), a $386 million network of over 900 ocean sensors. The system, operational for a decade, monitors ocean circulation, marine ecosystems, climate change, and extreme weather, with data freely available to the public and used in over 500 scientific studies. The NSF proposed removing most instruments from waters off Oregon, Washington, Alaska, North Carolina, and Greenland by 2027, framing it as a shift in research priorities. Senators Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) led a letter signed by eight other senators, accusing the NSF of acting illegally by dismantling a project authorized and funded by Congress. They argued the move undermines the constitutional separation of powers, with Merkley calling it ‘supreme stupidity.’ The senators urged a full review and consultation with marine scientists before any further action. House Democrats from the Science, Space and Technology Committee and the Natural Resources Committee sent a sharper rebuke, calling the NSF’s plan ‘expensive, destructive, and illegal.’ Led by Reps. Zoe Lofgren and Jared Huffman, 46 lawmakers demanded the agency immediately cease dismantling the OOI, citing its critical role in monitoring coastal safety, marine currents, and extreme weather events. The NSF cited a 2025 National Academies report on ocean science as partial justification for the cuts, stating it remains committed to ocean research while prioritizing new scientific objectives. The agency’s proposed 2026 budget included a 55% reduction in funding, which lawmakers linked to the decision. Scientists criticized the move for lacking warning or scientific review, raising concerns about long-term data gaps in climate and marine research. The OOI was originally designed for 15–20 years of operation, but lawmakers argue its dismantling would disrupt decades of continuous ocean monitoring. The dispute highlights tensions between executive branch budget decisions and congressional funding authority.
This content was automatically generated and/or translated by AI. It may contain inaccuracies. Please refer to the original sources for verification.