Trump lashes out at Iran as two sides give conflicting details on agreement

Former US President Donald Trump criticized Iran for what he called inaccurate state media descriptions of a potential US-Iran agreement, while conflicting details emerged between diplomatic sources and senior Trump officials. Pakistan’s prime minister and Iran’s foreign minister stated that a final agreement text was near completion, with a possible signing ceremony in Geneva as early as Sunday, though Israel’s skepticism remains a hurdle.
Former US President Donald Trump accused Iran of providing dishonorable and inaccurate state media descriptions of a proposed interim US-Iran agreement. Diplomatic sources told CNN the proposal would extend the ceasefire, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, and prepare for talks on Iran’s nuclear program, while a senior Trump official claimed the agreement includes dismantling Iran’s nuclear capabilities and ending Tehran’s support for proxy groups—contradicting Iranian media reports. Pakistan’s prime minister announced that the US and Iran had agreed on a final text and were finalizing next steps, while Iran’s foreign minister stated an agreement had never been closer. Sources suggest a signing ceremony could take place in Geneva, Switzerland, as early as Sunday, with additional peace talks planned for the weekend. The Trump administration expressed confidence that Israel would support the deal, despite skepticism from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. A senior US official said the full terms had not yet been shared with regional allies, but insisted the final agreement would meet objectives and avoid misreporting. Trump spoke with Netanyahu on Thursday, though Israeli concerns about the deal’s strictness persist. The memorandum of understanding outlines a 60-day period for technical negotiations if signed. The Trump administration acknowledged Israel’s skepticism but emphasized that the deal would require Iranian compliance before any benefits were delivered. A senior official also noted that future Israeli military action in Lebanon could not be ruled out if Iran failed to honor obligations, though a broader regional peace agreement would include Lebanon, Israel, and Gulf nations. The deal’s specifics remain under discussion, but sources confirm negotiations are advancing despite conflicting public statements. The US and Iran appear close to finalizing terms, though regional allies, particularly Israel, remain wary of the agreement’s potential outcomes.
This content was automatically generated and/or translated by AI. It may contain inaccuracies. Please refer to the original sources for verification.