Who won the Iran-US war: Trump, Tehran or Pakistan? And who lost?

The United States and Iran have agreed to end their conflict through a Pakistan-mediated peace deal, with a virtual signing ceremony scheduled for 19 June in Geneva. Analysts and officials disagree on the outcomes, with Iran gaining leverage over the Strait of Hormuz, while Pakistan’s military leadership, including Army Chief Asim Munir, has emerged as a key mediator in the negotiations.
The United States and Iran have agreed to end their military campaign through a Pakistan-mediated ceasefire, with a virtual signing ceremony planned for 19 June in Geneva. The deal comes after nearly four months of conflict, with both sides offering conflicting accounts of its terms, particularly regarding financial relief for Iran. According to a PBS NewsHour fact-check, while the US and Israel achieved battlefield successes, Iran has strengthened its control over the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil and gas chokepoint. Pentagon officials told Congress that over 80% of the conflict’s objectives remain unresolved, undermining claims of a clear US victory. Pakistan’s role in brokering the deal has elevated its military leadership, particularly Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir, who met with US President Donald Trump in June 2025 to discuss mediation efforts. Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Munir engaged directly with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Trump to push for de-escalation, including deferring a planned US strike. The virtual signing was chosen over an in-person ceremony in Europe due to Trump’s travel schedule ahead of the G7 summit in France. Reports indicate ongoing discrepancies between Washington and Tehran on the agreement’s details, particularly financial provisions, raising concerns about potential delays. Analysts suggest Iran’s influence over the Strait of Hormuz now provides Tehran with lasting economic leverage, a shift that predates the conflict. Pakistan’s diplomatic efforts have also positioned it as a critical intermediary in resolving regional tensions, despite past US skepticism over its military ties.
This content was automatically generated and/or translated by AI. It may contain inaccuracies. Please refer to the original sources for verification.